<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng" type="application/xml"
	schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title type="main">William Hone to John Childs, 2 November, 1839</title>
        <title type="sub">An Electronic Edition</title>
        <author>
          <name key="Hone, William, 1780-1842">William Hone</name>
        </author>
        <editor>
          <name xml:id="KG" key="Grimes, Kyle">Kyle Grimes</name>
        </editor>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>

        <p>For publication in the Hone Correspondence section of the William Hone BioText,
          http://honearchive.org. The letter is published under a Creative Commons license, details
          of which are accessible from the BioText homepage.</p>

      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <p>Transcribed from the original in British Library, Add. MS 40120, ff. 481-82.</p>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2021-02-07" who="#KG">Re-edited and enriched TEI coding; initial transform using
        modified XSL.</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div type="letter" n="1839-11-02">
        <head>William Hone to <ref type="person" target="whoswho.html#ChildsJohn">John Childs</ref>,
            <date when="1839-11-02">2 November, 1839</date>. <anchor xml:id="citation"/><note
            resp="#KG" place="foot">British Library, Add. MS 40120, ff. 481-82.<ref
              target="#citation">[return]</ref></note> &#8212; <ref type="tei-link"
            target="1839-11-02-toChilds-new.xml"> -TEI- </ref>
        </head>
        <div type="letterbox">
          <opener>
            <salute>Botheration John!</salute>
          </opener>
          <div type="lettertext">
            <p> Is there to be no end to the botheration? "Shrink not from the <hi rend="underline"
                >word</hi>" (I quote from memory) "Rejoice rather that there is such a word
              signifying such a thing," but shrink from the <hi rend="underline">thing</hi> &#8212;
              for observe: &#8212; 
              <list>
                <item><hi rend="underline">Bother</hi>, <gloss>is a word compounded of <hi
                      rend="underline">be</hi> and <hi rend="underline">other</hi>; to bother, is,
                    to <hi rend="underline">be other</hi>: hence, <hi rend="underline">being
                      other</hi> is, by transposition, <hi rend="underline">bothering</hi>: hence
                    also comes, by corruption, <hi rend="underline">botheration</hi>.
                    Again:&#8212;</gloss></item>
                <item><hi rend="underline">Bother</hi>, or <hi rend="underline">Bothering</hi>, <hi
                    rend="underline">being other</hi>, <gloss>though continually in practice, is <hi
                      rend="underline">being</hi> with the mind out of oneself, a state of <hi
                      rend="underline">being</hi> not definable in words, but acting rather
                    metaphysical, vulgarly called being out of one's mind, or <hi rend="underline"
                      >being</hi> beside oneself, which is, or are, two <hi rend="underline"
                      >beings</hi>, one <hi rend="underline">being</hi> beside the other, this not
                    being that, but both being this, which is inexplicable, <hi rend="underline"
                      >bothering</hi>.</gloss></item>
              </list> For example, a little&#8212;i.e. a little for example&#8212;"You shall have
                Cruden for Missus, and Adams for Peter"<anchor xml:id="a"/><note
                place="bottom" resp="#KG">Kent and Ewen (pp. 457-58) identify these figures as Alexander Cruden
                (1701-70) and Thomas Adams (1633-70); both were authors of books on religion and the
                Bible. <ref target="#a"> [return]</ref></note> &#8212; So you say, and so you have
              said, for months, and we are back where we were,&#8212;nothing done but bother,
              nothing doing but bothering, not being yourself, being beside yourself. I have the
                <unclear>promise</unclear> of <hi rend="underline">that</hi>, a nonentity, a <hi
                rend="underline">thing</hi>, to use metaphysical language, not <hi rend="underline"
                >in esse</hi>. And then your I. O. U, when I look at it, among the bills in my
              Cash-box, gives me as much anxiety as they do. But come, come here I mean to tea, and
              prove by action to "Missus" &amp; me, that the promise of the books is not to be an
              "everlasting no," and the I. O. U. I'll make a present of to Mrs. C's next boy. </p>
            <!-- <milestone unit="folio" n="481b"/> -->
            <p> Observe, lastly, as the old postillers said, I am in winter quarters for the whole
              season, and possibly for life. This suspicion discloses to me the difference between
              Free Will and True Agency, and affords to me leisure for thinking, in drear hours,
              when too worn to write, or speak. Adams I hear of to such a purport that, if I would
              buy any book, I should buy that. </p>
            <p> Observe moreover, that I <hi rend="underline">cannot</hi> get out, and therefore if
              we meet it must be <hi rend="underline">here</hi>. From three to 5 I endeavour for
              sleep. At 5 we drink tea. I don't rise till near ten, &amp; get to bed early. Rest and
              warmth are <hi rend="underline">essential</hi> to me &#8212; that I experience. So <hi
                rend="underline">come</hi> with your opium story. You cannot go to Bungay during Guy
              Fawkes time &#8212; it's against the New Metropolitan Police Act to let off <hi
                rend="underline">Crackers</hi>! </p>
            <p> Observe moreover, lastly, we have an inmate about Sam's age &#8212; a fine youth,
              son of Rev. W. Kent of Barnstaple, formerly of Bungay. The young man was apprenticed
              to a printer of Exeter, &amp; since he came to me, has engaged himself to Messrs Roake
              &amp; Varty of the Strand. He has been well trained every way, and we deem him a
              valuable addition to our family &#8212; morally valuable, and pecuniarily. </p>
         
           
          </div>
          <closer> I am, my dear Childs<lb/> Yours faithfully<lb/>
            <signed>W Hone</signed><lb/>
          </closer>
          <postscript>
            <p>
              <address>
                <addrLine>5 Bolt Court</addrLine>
              </address>
              <date when="1839-11-02">2 November 1839.</date>
            </p>
            <p> I am told I made a mistake in the Duration of time &#8212; but it seems to me as
              long as I supposed it to be. So take this explanation outside, by way of Postscript
              within.<anchor xml:id="b"/><note place="bottom" resp="#KG">This last paragraph is written on the outside
                of the folded sheet, just opposite the address. <ref target="#b"
                > [return]</ref></note>
              <lb/>WH, <date when="1839-11-04">4 Nov. 1839.</date>
            </p>
            <p> [Addressed:]<lb/> For<lb/> John Childs Esq.<lb/> London Coffee House </p>

          </postscript>

        </div>
      </div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
