<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng" type="application/xml"
	schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>William Hone to John Childs, 7 February, 1831</title>
        <editor>Kyle Grimes</editor>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>For publication in the Hone Correspondence section of the William Hone BioText.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <p>British Library, Add. MS 40120, ff. 369-70. </p>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2021-01-15" who="#KG">Re-edited and enriched TEI coding; initial transform using
        modified XSL.</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div type="letter" n="1832-02-07">
        <head>William Hone to John Childs, <date when="1832-02-07">7 February, 1832</date>. <note
            resp="#KG" place="foot">British Library, Add. MS 40120, ff. 369-70</note>
        </head>
        <opener>
          <address>
            <addrLine>Grasshopper Hotel</addrLine>
          </address><lb/>
          <address>
            <addrLine>Gracechurch Street, London</addrLine>
          </address>
          <date when="1832-02-07">7 February 1832.</date><lb/>
          <salute>My dear Childs,</salute>
        </opener>
        <p> I duly received a very kind letter from you dated 22 Dec. 1831 introductory to the
          annual Turkey, which as duly arrived, and which you will have pleasure in knowing was
          eaten in more comfort, with more of heart's-ease for sauce, than some of its predecessors.
          This perennial recollection of me and mine, the recurrence of it at a stated season,
          without one interruption, is an instance of continued desire to maintain an intimacy of
          feeling, to which the infrequency of our meeting has not seemed very favorable. I must add
          too, that there has been very little on my part, which, if you were an ordinary-minded
          man, would tend to perpetuate the remembrance of a promise you have so well kept&#8212;and I
          have not unfrequently endeavored to account for your constancy. I have looked at you as "a
          man of the world," or in other words, "a man of business," and in this light you would not
          object to be considered. But how, or why, a <emph rend="underline">mere</emph> man of the
          world, a <emph rend="underline">mere</emph> man of business, should, or could, think it
          his interest to bestow a thought or an acceptable token of regard upon one who is
          notoriously not much of either has occasioned me some perplexity&#8212;for, in the way of
          business, you could have no expectation of deriving anything from me, and I have made no
          return of the obligation, have not always, perhaps acknowledged it, and mostly, <!-- <milestone
            unit="folio" n="369v"/> -->when I have, it has been at an over-due period of time. Then,
          again, when we have met, our conversation, as regards ourselves personally, has been
          usually in the tone of banter. I have sometimes endeavoured with some earnestness to get
          you, upon such occasions, into a serious and holding mood, but always to my discomfiture.
          Well then, coupling these matters &amp; considerations, with our seldom seeing each other,
          I tell you that I begin to <unclear>[one word]</unclear> more closely how it is that you
          and I are still "friends," beyond the vulgar erroneous meaning of the term; and, in
          downright earnest, in plain truth and sincereity, I shall be glad if you will, as you can,
          assist me in answering the question. Now this letter, at so long a lapse from the coming
          of the "beast," cannot be any evidence to you, as a man of the world, or of business, that
          I have assimilated to you in either character, and yet I almost persuade myself that,
          apart from our joking, you will in sober earnestness, acquaint me with so much as will set
          me right upon the point. I know you are a <emph rend="underline">close</emph> man. I wish
          you would <emph rend="underline">open</emph> to me on the matter in question &#8212; if you do
          I know you will not deceive me, for I know you are not a deceiver. We are in many respects
          opposite, I want to know our points of junction. You are not a <emph rend="underline"
            >mere</emph> man of business, not a <emph rend="underline">mere</emph> man of the world,
          what are you else though? Answer me <emph rend="underline">that</emph>, John Childs, and,
          so far, I shall be satisfied. </p>
        <p>
          <emph rend="underline">In re Turkey</emph>. You intimated that "on Cmas day at four
          oclock" you should "fill a bumper" to our house &amp; home. We did not dine till within a
          quarter of an hour of that four o'clock, and then, allowing for difference of clocks, at
          that <!--<milestone unit="folio" n="370a"/> -->number of starters upon the table, I and mine
          stood up with half empty mouths, and brimmers, and drank, to the founder of the feast and
          all around his table, health and happiness, and all that heart can desire that is good for
          it. </p>
        <p> To your inquiry in matters of Politics I answer, what you know to be the fact, the
          potshards are striving with the potshards&#8212;in fact, though I cannot be indifferent to the
          result, I take little interest in the immediate strife. Whatever power rectitude may have
          in the political affairs of the world, will be after the battle has been fought between
          the conflicting parties&#8212;for <emph rend="underline">this</emph> is not a mere adjustment
          of differences between men who think differently on points of policy, but it is a
          death-grapple between fiends, wherein the greater will destroy the lesser, and they who
          may be of less informed minds will assuredly perish if they enlist into the ranks. I care
          not for the <emph rend="underline">seeming</emph> virtue of the "cause." I know that the
            <emph rend="underline">real</emph> virtue will not be actively displayed during the
          onslaught without being trodden down into the filth &amp; bloody mire of the furious
          combatants. The present is a mere affair of pickets, the driving of the outposts, the
          engagement is to come, and it will be between the Apollyons of Toryism and the Belials of
          Reform &#8212; then, and after they have destroyed each other, and Pride and servile baseness
          lie with death-wounds on the field of the unholy fight, then, and not till then, can the
          humble and the honest come forth with any chance of contributing to the freedom and
          happiness of human beings. I speak of no events that are likely to happen soon, but in my
          mind's eye I see a "dark hour coming." </p>
        <closer> I am, My dear Childs,<lb/> Sincerely<lb/>
          <signed>W Hone</signed>
        </closer>
        <postscript>
          <p> </p>
          <p> [Addressed:]<lb/> For:<lb/> Mr. John Childs<lb/> Bungay<lb/> Suffolk </p>
        </postscript>
      </div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
