<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng" type="application/xml"
	schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title type="main">William Hone to Robert Childs, 13 June, 1831</title>
        <title type="sub">An Electronic Edition</title>
        <author>
          <name key="Hone, William, 1780-1842">William Hone</name>
        </author>
        <editor>
          <name xml:id="KG" key="Grimes, Kyle">Kyle Grimes</name>
        </editor>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>

        <p>For publication in the Hone Correspondence section of the William Hone BioText,
          http://honearchive.org. The letter is published under a Creative Commons license, details
          of which are accessible from the BioText homepage.</p>

      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <p>Transcribed from the original in British Library, Add. MS 40120, ff. 355-56.</p>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2021-01-17" who="#KG">Transcribed using notes from BL and K&amp;E copy.
      </change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div type="letter" n="183-06-13">
        <head>William Hone to <ref type="person" target="whoswho.html#ChildsRobert">Robert
            Childs</ref>, <date when="1831-06-13">13 June, 1831</date>.<anchor xml:id="citation"
            /><note resp="#KG" place="foot">British Library, Add. MS 40120, ff. 355-56. Hone had
            recently travelled to Bungay where Robert Childs, an amateur phrenologist, had made a
            plaster cast of Hone's head. The letter shows both the jocular discourse Hone typically
            engaged in with the Childs' brothers as well as the semi-seriousness with which they
            took the study of phrenology.<ref target="#citation">[return]</ref></note> &#8212; <ref
            type="tei-link" target="1831-06-13-toChildsRobert.xml"> -TEI- </ref>
        </head>
        <div type="letterbox">
          <opener>
            <address>
              <addrLine><ref type="place">13 Gracechurch Street</ref></addrLine>
            </address>
            <date when="1825-04-04">13 June 1831</date>
            <lb/><salute>Dear Robert</salute>
          </opener>
          <div type="lettertext">
            <p>Without a joke out of, from, belonging, appertaining unto, respecting, or concerning,
              or on, or about, my head&#8212;but, seriously, intending and devising how to obtain or
              procure it&#8212;I say, seriously, "I wish I may get it."</p>
            <p>Your letter, courting the infliction of penalties I proposed, would be a baffler,
              were I to let you <emph>have</emph> your wicked wish, epistolarily, (<emph>see</emph>
              Johnson) or visitorially. I can neither write nor see you&#8212;"Come and hear the
              grasshoppers." In truth I hear enough of "the Grasshopper in Gracechurch Street," and
              I almost premise, from these premises, I shall never be able to go in search of
              another. You tell me of "shores" &amp; "skies" &amp; mouldering ruins" in Norfolk (or,
              'save you, Suffolk)&#8212;I beg to tell <emph>you</emph> that, from the room in which
              I write at this instant, the <emph>old walls</emph> of the X keys inn<anchor
                xml:id="d"/><note place="bottom" resp="#KG">This is the Crosse Keys public house,
                still in business, in Gracechurch Street.<ref target="#d">[return]</ref></note> are
              before me, &amp; confine my view to the <emph>sky</emph> only and I now the "common
                <emph>shore</emph>" at every change of the weather. Think of that, Master Robert, in
                "<emph>this</emph> blessed month of June," and wonder, when I tell you, that I am
              content. I have little of encumbrances, but many duties upon me, and have suffered too
              much from waywardness, to give way to fidgetty wants &amp; wishes. It would pleasure
              me, and do me much good, to have the run of a friend's house in the country this
              summer, but I must walk cautiously about my own, &amp; there only, or the
              "Grasshopper" will cease to hop as it ought.</p>
            <p>I caught up a pamphlet at John Atkinson's which you advised him to read, &amp;
              brought it away to read myself&#8212;"Mr. Beverley's Pamphlet"&#8212;it is a most
                <emph>tremendoous</emph> blow, &amp; if he follows it up, will be "the beginning of
              the end."<anchor xml:id="a"/><note place="bottom" resp="#KG">The pamphlet is Robert
                Mackenzie Beverley's "A Letter to His Grace the Archbishop of York, on the Present
                Corrupt State of the Church of England" (1831). The pamphlet offers a damning
                assessment of what Beverley sees as the self-satisfied corruption of the established
                church. A small sample will give a sense of Beverley's rhetoric: "The Church of
                England, as it is now constituted, is a machine of Anti-Christ, greatly surpassing,
                in the grossness of its abuses, all other jobs or systems of corruption that ever
                have afflicted the kingdom; and so much mischief has it done to religion, besides
                all the political enormities with which it may be charged, that all pious persons
                should hail with shouts of joy, that high and holy day, now not far distant, when
                the Church of England will be abolished by act of Parliament, deprived entirely of
                all its revenues, and put on an equality with the other Christian sects tolerated in
                this country” (16). <ref target="#a">[return]</ref></note> Clearly he is a young
              man, &amp; throws away much of his power, by his fierceness. If he does not cool, or
              fanaticise, into weakness, he has the bull by the horns, &amp; notwithstanding some
              monstrous exaggerations, he, <emph>alone</emph>, may bring down the <emph>whole</emph>
              enormous mass of clerical encumbrance. Still, to <emph>my</emph> eye, <emph>he</emph>
              is not the man who will achieve this&#8212;much he can &amp; will do&#8212;he knows
              the great points, &amp; therefore cannot fail of doing <emph>much</emph>&#8212;but to
              effect, <emph>all</emph>, a man who attempts it must be a lover of the truth for the
              truth's sake, forget himself wholly, be unmoved by scorn &amp; threats, and, above
              all, be sensible to the greater calamity&#8212;which besets well-doers, &amp;
              obstructs their well-doing&#8212;<emph>praise</emph>. Singleness of purpose is the
              essential requisite to an honest &amp; able reformer&#8212;Mr. Beverley has the
              ability, is he <emph>honest</emph>? If he is, why does he <emph>judge</emph> so
              unsparkingly? I confess I do not admire certain wholsesale denunciations of
                <emph>estimated</emph> numbers. The cause of which he volunteers to be the champion
              is too good, or in might be vitally injured by some of his
              misrepresentations&#8212;nor does it require the aid of such auxiliaries as his
              clap-trap, about restoring the churches to their former owners, seems to entice:
              scrupulous readers may incline to imagine something <emph>esoteric</emph> in the
              meaning of thos passages. </p>
            <p>However, the cause, as I said, is good&#8212;but it cannot be worked out to its
              fulness of result by unholy hands&#8212;neither will the accomplishment of the work be
              delayed unduly, by its remaining for a time unattempted. One of the very good portions
              of Mr. Beverley's pamphlet, which must tell with every one, is the irrefutable
              exposition of the fact, that the Church with all its corruptions has reformed nothing
              since it was established. It has not&#8212;it can not&#8212;and for this reason, it
                <emph>dare</emph> not <emph>move</emph>&#8212;and it being of the nature of
              corruption to extend, the putrescence has enlarged with increasing years&#8212;the
              longer it remains the worse it will become&#8212;"it <emph>must</emph> become worse."
              Shall I tell you a <emph>true</emph> story? A young medical friend of mine from the
              North, had an infant patient, which he was called to after it was beyond his skill to
              help. The child died, and in a few days the father brought the body to him with a
              request to preserve it &amp; inject the veins &amp; arteries&#8212;they differed about
              the charge &amp; negotiated day after day, the child remaining all the while in the
              surgeon's cellar, till the parents' ardour for preservation cooled, &amp; the body
              became a nuisance&#8212;the more it smelt, the more my friend pestered the father with
              messages to take it away, &amp; the more inclined was the fond parent not to meddle
              with it&#8212;at length the smell wholly ceased &amp; the body was almost forgotten
              when Tim the surgeon observed, in place if it, a shapeless mass of blue mould&#8212;so
              it remianed till, the last time I asked him about it, and then he told me it had
              wasted &amp; withered, melted &amp; dried, that it almost defied discrimination to
              detect what it had been&#8212;at first it was too noisome to tolerate, and now "it's
              past," as Tim says, "egad sir, it's <emph>past</emph> throwing away."</p>
            <p>Yours finally &amp; sincerely<lb/> W. Hone. </p>
            <p>[Hone continues the letter with an afterthought:]</p>
            <p>P.S. <emph rend="underline">Mind</emph>&#8212;<emph>no more letters from me.</emph> I
              find reading &amp; writing bad things. Reading is a lazy-making employment, &amp;
              writing a worthless one, &amp; above all things I hate letter writing&#8212;I cannot
              write letters of business, U no Y &amp; my other letters, having no others to write,
              always run into length. I took up this sheet merely to say that I wrote you before,
              when I was hypp'd from keeping indoors, &amp; that all I desired &amp; desire amounts
              to this&#8212;that, as soon as you can, I shall really be glad if <emph>you</emph>
              will let me have the <emph>cast</emph> of my head, for my wife &amp; girls desire to
              see it. To this I add that, as a particular favor, I request you will put on paper a
              plain (not a jocose) statement of the developments, &amp; absence of development, as
              they appear from the cast. If you are a cunning man you will hesitate&#8212;if you are
              honest you will do it at once, &amp;, if there be truth in Phrenology, you will find
              enough upon my skull to assure you that you may safely communicate the truth &amp; the
                <emph>whole</emph> truth to me, for whose eye alone it is intended. I make this
              request in sober earnestness&#8212; </p>

          </div>
          <closer>My dear Childs,<lb/> W.H.<lb/><lb/>
            <emph>Memory</emph>. Philosophers place it in the rear of the head, and it seems the
            mone of memory lies there, because there men naturally dig for it, scratching it when
            they are at a loss." <emph>Fuller.</emph><anchor xml:id="b"/><note place="bottom"
              resp="#KG">Hone's reference is to Thomas Fuller's <emph>The Holy State, and the
                Profane State</emph> which was initially published in 1642 but was widely known in
              antiquarian and religious circles. It would soon be reissued by Thomas Tegg, the
              publisher of Hone's more recent antiquarian works.<ref target="#b"
              >[return]</ref></note>
          </closer>

        </div>
      </div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
