<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/teilite.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title type="main">William Hone to Walter Wilson, 22 January, 1823</title>
        <title type="sub">An Electronic Edition</title>
        <author>
          <name key="Hone, William, 1780-1842">William Hone</name>
        </author>
        <editor>
          <name xml:id="KG" key="Grimes, Kyle">Kyle Grimes</name>
        </editor>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>For publication in the Hone Correspondence section of the William Hone BioText,
          http://honearchive.org. The letter is published under a Creative Commons license, details
          of which are accessible from the BioText homepage.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <p>Transcribed from the originial in the British Library, Add. MS 40120, ff. 186-89; This
          letter is actually a handwritten copy of Hone's original.</p>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div type="letter" n="1823-01-22">
        <head>William Hone to <ref target="whoswho.html#WilsonWalter">Walter Wilson</ref>, <date
            when="1823-01-22">22 January, 1823</date>.<anchor xml:id="citation"/><note resp="#KG" place="foot">British
            Library, Add. MS 40120, ff. 186-89. <ref target="#citation">[return]</ref></note> &#8212; <ref type="tei-link"
            target="1823-01-22-toWilson.xml"> -TEI- </ref>
        </head>
        <div type="letterbox">
        <opener> Pre-script (there being no room for a post script)&#8212; If you take this letter
          ill we shall both be mistaken. <address><addrLine><ref type="place">London</ref> </addrLine></address>
          <date when="1823-01-22"> 22 January 1823</date><lb/>
          <salute>Dear Wilson,</salute>
        </opener>
        <div type="lettertext">
        <p> I am half angry with you, not for scolding or half scolding me but because you are doing
          what you ought not to attempt without adequate means. Now I am not conscious of having
          affected to be "<emph rend="underline">a busy man</emph>"<anchor xml:id="a"/><note
            place="bottom" resp="#KG">Hone is responding to Wilson's language in his <ref
              target="1823-01-17-frWilson.html">letter of 17 January, 1823</ref>. <ref target="#a"
              >[return]</ref></note> &#8212; but I have had the business of others thrust upon me,
          to the occupation of time that ought to have been devoted to my own, and "in my sear and
          yellow leaf"<anchor xml:id="b"/><note place="bottom" resp="#KG"><title>Macbeth</title>
            (V.iii.23). <ref target="#b">[return]</ref></note> I am seeking fresh sap to put forth a
          few branches for the protection of my family. Yet <emph rend="underline">you</emph> I
          acquit wholly from having been on of these depredations on the "stuff that life is made
          of" &#8212; but I am compelled to say <emph rend="underline">NO</emph> for the first time
          almost I ever did to an old friend, and that simply because I cannot say Yes without
          injury to my self of which you can scarcely form a notion. Still I cannot forbear to
          exemplify by telling you that my work on "the mysteries"<anchor xml:id="c"/><note
            place="bottom" resp="#KG"><ref type="publication"
              target="../../bibliographical/annotated.html#AMD-23"><title>Ancient Mysteries
                Described</title></ref>, which Hone was about to publish. <ref target="#c">[return]</ref></note> did not come out at
          Christmas as announced, nor can it on the last of this month as <emph rend="underline"
            >positively</emph> announced, because I literally cannot make the time necessary for its
          completion, and I have only about a sheet of it to do. </p>

        <p> Concerning "the many things which <emph rend="underline">I have</emph>" towards
          assisting you in the <title>Life of Defoe</title> your friend Williams misinformed you.
          When I last saw you in town, you entreated me to put together what I could in that way,
          and appointed a certain morning to call upon me and see what I had done. Though heavy to
          move on a <milestone unit="folio"/> slight application, yet the name of <ref type="person"
              ><name key="Defoe, Daniel, 1661?-1731">DeFoe</name></ref> was a "word of power" and in
          rummaging I employed myself diligently, and till the hour of three on that morning when I
          expected you between 9 &amp; 10 very anxiously&#8212;waited at hand the whole forenoon
          fidgetly&#8212;your presence would have been as grateful to me as "the breath of Maia to
          the lovesick shepherdess"<anchor xml:id="d"/><note place="bottom" resp="#KG">from <ref
              type="person"><name key="Thomson, James, 1700-1748">James Thomson</name></ref>'s <ref
              type="publication"><title>The Seasons</title></ref>. <ref target="#d"
            >[return]</ref></note>&#8212;but Lo! on sending to <ref type="place">Ely Place</ref> I
          found you had gone off for <unclear>[[one word]]</unclear> which seemed to me as though
          you were too anxious for a DeFoeite and I will frankly confess that the disappointment
          very much mortified me. By degrees what I had got together were once more dispersed by my
          own occasions for reference and the thing is to me as though it were not "<emph
            rend="underline">You</emph> do not mean to <ref type="place">London</ref> again till
            <emph rend="unerline">you</emph> have finished the book" &#8212; the more to your shame.
          "It is impossible" you say, very well, you cannot make a <emph rend="underline">bad</emph>
          book I know, but will not make so good a one as you may, and I acknowledge to you that I
          take little interest in that which does not interest <emph rend="underline">you</emph>
          sufficiently to forsake the "fat contented easy ignorance" of a country town in search of
          knowledge that is to be got by seeking for it in London. Were I as you are and with the
          same object in view, neither hedge-row elms, nor Christmas festivities nor aught in "bed
          or board" I love would detain me from the laborious inquiries essential to its final and
          successful accomplishment. The <title>Life of DeFoe</title> is to be dug for in the
          writings of his contemporaries, and where they are in large masses there should you
          excavate&#8212;at the <ref type="place">British Museum</ref>, <ref type="place">Sion
            College</ref>, <ref type="place">Dr. Williams's</ref>&#8212;in short into all public and
          private collections you should burrow, and access is easy to all. Without <milestone
            unit="folio"/> this the <title>Life of De Foe</title> will be no more. I thought I knew
          you better, and nothing but your own acknowledgement on paper could convince me that you
          were about to commit <emph rend="underline">murder</emph>. "Conjure <emph rend="underline"
            >me</emph> by <emph rend="underline">my</emph> love of DeFoe" Fie! fie! I <emph
            rend="underline">do</emph> love him and so much <emph rend="underline">better than you
            do</emph> that I would rather he reposed in his grave with no other record than <ref
            type="publication">Mr. Chalmers's memoir,</ref><anchor xml:id="e"/><note place="bottom"
            resp="#KG">George Chalmers's <title>Life of Daniel De Foe</title> (1785), which was,
            until the eventual publication of Wilson's <title>Memoir of the Life and Times of Daniel
              De Foe</title> in 1830, the standard biography. <ref target="#e">[return]</ref></note>
          and his own works as his imperishable monument, than see his <emph rend="underline"
            >ghost</emph> revised by you who can do so much better, and all that I could wish if you
            <emph rend="underline">will</emph> You have no right to call upon <ref type="person"
            target="whoswho.html#DyerGeorge">Mr. Dyer</ref>, or myself, or any one for assistance,
          till you can show that you have spent not 3 but 6 months in London, <emph rend="underline"
            >alone</emph>, seeing no one, and thinking of nothing, but about De Foe. You must have
          collected materials of course and the set of the "Review" is a fine block to chip from but
          you have not got <emph rend="underline">all</emph>. I mean all that you <emph
            rend="underline">can</emph>. This is what I quarrel with you for, to excite you to, to
          this, and be like the Walter Wilson that I knew a dozen years ago&#8212;<emph
            rend="underline">he</emph> was a fine fellow at a scent, and when the hunt was up would
          follow in a steeple chase. Your <emph rend="underline">power</emph> is greater now than it
          was then&#8212;let your <emph rend="underline">resolve</emph> be equal and we may have a
          life of De Foe yet, but not without 6 months of <emph rend="underline">your</emph> life in
          London. </p>
        </div>
        <closer> Yours Truly,<lb/>
          <signed>W. Hone</signed>
        </closer>
          </div>
      </div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
