<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng" type="application/xml"
	schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title type="main">William Hone to The Editor of the Quarterly Review, 25 October,
          1821</title>
        <title type="sub">An Electronic Edition</title>
        <author>
          <name key="Hone, William, 1780-1842">William Hone</name>
        </author>
        <editor>
          <name xml:id="KG" key="Grimes, Kyle">Kyle Grimes</name>
        </editor>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>

        <p>For publication in the Hone Correspondence section of the William Hone BioText,
          http://honearchive.org. The letter is published under a Creative Commons license, details
          of which are accessible from the BioText homepage.</p>

      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <p>Transcribed from the original in National Library of Scotland, Nineteenth Century
          Literary Society: The John Murray Archive, MS.42254.</p>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2021-03-03" who="#KG">Transcribed from image downloaded from NLS.</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div type="letter" n="1821-10-25">
        <head>William Hone to The Editor of the
            Quarterly Review, <date when="1821-10-25">25 October, 1821</date>.<anchor
            xml:id="citation"/><note resp="#KG" place="foot">National Library of Scotland,
            Nineteenth Century Literary Society: The John Murray Archive, MS.42254. In October of
            1821, <title>The Quarterly Review</title> (25 [1821]: 347-65) published an anonymous but
            scathing review of Hone's <title>Apocryphal New Testament</title>. The review has
              subsequently been attributed to Robert Hugh Rose (<title>Quarterly Review Archive</title>,
              https://romantic-circles.org/reference/qr/index/50.html.)<ref target="#citation">
              [return]</ref></note> &#8212; <ref type="tei-link" target="1821-10-25-toQuarterly.xml"
            > -TEI- </ref>
        </head>
        <div type="letterbox">
          <opener>
            <address>
              <addrLine><ref type="place">Ludgate Hill</ref></addrLine>
            </address>
            <date when="1821-10-25">25 October 1821</date>
            <salute>Sir</salute>
          </opener>
          <div type="lettertext">
            <p>I never did an act in my life that I am afraid to acknowledge, and, as I am the sole
              and unassisted Editor of the "Apocryphal New Testament," I feel no more hesitation in
              avowing it, than difficulty in justifying it. Had the "Quarterly Review" confined its
              strictures to an examination of the book I should have had no reason to address you
              thus &#8212; but a week's reflection has confirmed the first impression with which I
              read the attack upon me personally in your last number, and I think on a reperusal
              must feel that the Article is of such a character as to authorize me in requesting the
              name of my unknown calumniator.</p>
            <p>The Reviewer himself professes so warm an indignation at a "dastard behind" that he
              will, of course, be eager to come forward, and thus avoid the imputation of being one
              himself &#8212; or perhaps in your case, as in mine, there may be no "dastard behind,"
              and if so you will not refuse the opportunity I now offer you, of raising yourself
              from the degradation of a concealed, to the respectability of an open assailant.</p>
            <p>I urge this request that I may meet my adversary on equal terms in the pamphlet I
              have announced &#8212; and I trust that the manner in which I should treat him if I
              knew his name would convince even the Reviewer himself with what injustice he has
              applied epithets to me, which if I had employed towards him he would be entitled to
              call upon me to substantiate or retract.</p>
            <p>I await your answer, and</p>

            <p/>
          </div>
          <closer>I am<lb/> Sir<lb/>Your most obedient<lb/>humble Servant<lb/>
            <signed>W Hone</signed>
          </closer>
          <trailer>
            The Editor of The Quarterly Review.<lb/>
          </trailer>
        </div>
      </div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
